Saturday, 20 February 2010

Evaluation of the Finished Magazine























Evaluation of the finished magazine

For my final magazine I used a futuristic font, called DeLarge, which was almost identical to the one I designed on my flat plan. I chose a futuristic font as the genre of my magazine is electro and the sounds in this genre are always compared to quite futuristic sounds e.g. synthesizers and keytars. This font is used on my contents as well. I did this to keep my magazine consistent like an actual music magazine like NME. For my main image on the front cover I chose to take a conventional picture with my model making eye contact with the camera but, it is different to similar magazines as my model was wearing full body paint and glittery eye make up. This would make my magazine stand out in a magazine shop for its individuality. The glitter and the body paint on the black background stands out giving my front cover visual impact. My magazine also doesn't have any main sells on the front cover which is different to a conventional magazine. I think the image and its masthead are strong enough to sell the magazine to the reader. Plus I have done the conventional banner at the bottom to show what bands the magazine includes. Like the NME one below. However, by not having main sells it could cause problems because some people may not expect it to be a music magazine as it does not have any obvious indication of it being a music magazine (like images of musical instruments) apart from the banner which may not stand out as much as main sells would. This could be a flaw in my magazine. If I did it again I could possibly have an image of my artist with a musical instrument or a piece of musical equipment like a synthesiser. Another improvement I need to make to my front cover is that I decided that my bar code and price would be on the back of my magazine and the date and issue number on the spine. But this wouldn't be clear to someone who picks up my magazine in the shop. So if I was to do it again I would put the bar code, price, issue number and date on the front of my magazine, rather then the back and spine.




My contents page includes a band index just like similar music magazines like NME.
<-----
It also includes a letter from the editor which is not that common in music magazines but it is displayed in some magazines like gossip, fashion or an art magazine. As the genre of music I am looking at is often paired with art, I think this letter would fit in nicely with the theme. I am fairly happy with my contents page but I originally wanted to try something creative and different with the pictures. However, due to time and space, it didn't work out. If I would do it again I would leave a gap between the pictures or add a border to section them off from each other. I would also try and get another intresting picture on there like the one from my front cover, making it look like I have had a photo shoot with the artist and make the magazin emore consistent. I may also add another colour to the contents as the grey, black and white could be seen as a little dull. I think i would have made the background white and the writing black, like magazines like Kerrang! and NME as these Contents pages always look eye catching and more organised. I would also add something about subscribing to the magazine in the contents and any special deals there was on subscribing.

My double page spread is very similar to most interviews in music magazines. The layout is a simple two column structure, with two images and drop quotes. It is very identifiable as a music magazine. I think the content in my interview covered most areas that a fan would like to know about. I asked the band about touring, influences and festivals and the interview gave an in depth cover of these areas. For some reason when I posted the links to my double page spread on the blog, the left hand side piece looks like it has a different colour background to the right, however both are supposed to be black and this was just a computer malfunction. Maybe another improvement I would make to my double page spread was to put a border around the pictures or make them look like they are in a Polaroid format. I think this would look better as the moment they look a little unprofessionaly plonked on the page. I am, hoever, very happy with the title on the spread. I think my use of overlapping on the first letters makes the title look punchy and matches the style of the band I am interviewing.

The typical reader of my magazine are quite into individual style, like the music, so my front cover would appeal to them as it is unconventional and the artists image and attitude would attract their attention. The language on my front cover are words associated with electro/indie/pop music so the reader can relate to this and help them realise the genre of my magazine. The artists in the banner at the bottom also helps the reader realise the genre. The image may suggest that the magazine would appeal to the younger generation who are into outlandish and different music. The image shows a lot of attitude which is associated and stereotyped with the younger generation. The contents does not have a lot of colour and the masthead is written in the same font as the Front cover. The lack of colour is because the contents is meant to inform more then excite the reader. The images on the contents are there to excite the reader. The contents does convey the same electro pop attitude as the front cover. The use of language, like censored swear words and the language used in the editors letter suggest that the magazine is aimed at the younger generation as demotic language and some of the language would not be understood or seen as offensive by some of the older generation. This is the same for my double page spread. The images in my contents are all of live events and portray instruments used in this genre of music helping readers to understand it is aimed at people who are into the electro pop genre. The images on my double page spread, however, are unconventional. There is no eye contact made by the artists and in some cases, no faces on them at all. The artists are wearing makes and dressed in a style which teens can relate too and their posture and poses show attitude typical of the genre. The poses used would appeal to fans of the band I am interviewing as these pictures are influenced by the bands single covers, so the reader would relate them to the band. However one of my models is of the wrong sex, but I couldn't find a female model willing ot have pictures taken.
I think publishers like IPC media or Music Magazine Publishers Associations could publish my magazine for me. I know that IPC media publishes NME so I would approach them first on publishing my magazine as they are of similar genres and target audience. I could see my magazine being stocked in WHSmith as they have a large music section which stocks many different genres of music magazines. I could also stock my magazine in HMV as then it would be with other music magazines and music fans are more likely to go to a music shop and see it then a newsagents. This is the same for most music shops.
The audience for my music magazine final product would still be aimed at students or young people aged between 16-25 like I originally planned in Blog 2 of my main coursework task. I still think my magazine will be aimed at the socio economic group of BCD. I think that as the magazine will be similarly priced to NME this socio economic group makes sense for my magazine. It would probably be brought more by students with a part time job or young people who work full time as full time students have a lower income then them. My research into other magazines at the beginning of my project showed that employed people were more likely to buy magazines like NME, meaning that my magazine will too have a similar audience.
I attracted my audience with my bold main image on my front cover. I am proud of this image as my choice of face art and body paint really helped increase the boldness and eye catchiness of it. I also think the font used is interesting and different to magazines on the market today, making it yet again more appealing to my target audience. My mode of address to the reader was through the eye contact of the artist on the front cover. Once drawing their eye to my magazine, a bold banner at the bottom informs them of the artists my magazine includes. And if this genre appeals to them would make them purchase my magazine. My contents includes pictures which are taken from a festival which readers may have attended, making them relate to them more and be more interested in their purpose. My letter to the editor would then give the reader a sense of who was producing the magazine and see that it is someone passionate about the same genre as them and not just someone out to get their money. My double page spread catches the readers eyes with punchy drop quotes which would make the reader want to read the interview, even if they were not familiar to the band it's about.
I posted my magazine on http://www.facebook.co.uk/ to get some views and criticisms from my peers and people who might actually buy my magazine. Some criticisms I did get were about how much I put on my contents page, some people described it as slightly cluttered and maybe could have involved less or been set out slightly differently. Another criticism was that only the band index included page numbers. I agree that this could cause problems and would defiantly change it if I was to make my magazine again. Some positives people found were my use of images. They agreed my front image was bold nad owuld make them want to buy the magazine and also my photo editing on my double page spread impressed people. A friend even said it reminded her straight away of the image I had been trying to recreate.






From creating this product I have learnt many new skills on programmes such as InDesign and Photoshop. Photoshop allowed me to create the illusion that my artists had no faces and that the brick wall covered their faces. I would not have been able to do this without Photoshop. Photoshop also allowed me to change contrast and problems with colour and backgrounds which I would have either had to change by retaking the photo or tried to do messily in Paint. I had a few problems with InDesign at the beginning as I had not used the programme before and it is not the easiest site to navigate round or do what you are trying to do. I found that it took me a long time to even work out how to fill a shape with a colour as the colour option was tucked away at the side. Also I had problems with layering objects in my project because the programme was not able to do as I pleased. This meant I had to make some changes to my product so it would work in InDesign.
I feel I have learnt a lot more since my preliminary project. I have now learnt how to download fonts onto my computer from websites such as dafont.com, where I would have print screened them and copied them into paint before, giving me a grainy finish. I have also learnt a lot more terminology over the past months meaning my blog has improved vastly as I can talk about the media behind the initial magazine properly, things such as demographics and socio-economic groups. I have also developed my skills in InDesign and Photoshop through trial and error and guidance form my teachers. Things like exporting things as pdf's and converting them into jpeg's through Google documents. These skills I can use in future tasks in media studies. I have also learnt to plan more thoroughly for blogs and my magazine through making flat plans and brain storms of ideas. This I can remember and use in the future. My time management has also been tested in this project, meaning I now know how long processes can take and can plan better for the future.

I do think I encountered some problems in my blog due to the website I have had to use to make it. I found that my blog has looked messy in place because I couldn't make all the writing the same size or font. Also it is very hard to get the photos where I want them or the writing. This is annoying but of no fault of my own.

Tuesday, 9 February 2010

Planning and Evaluation of the Article




Planning and Evaluation of the Article
These articles are taken from NME and Kerrang! which are two magazines of a similar genre to my magazine. Both these articles are interviews with artists. The NME interview is with two different but similar artists, Kate Nash and Regina Spektor. This interview is of a different topic to the Kerrang! interview. The NME interview is about showing how similar these two artists are and showing a bond between them whereas the Kerrang! interview is about the artist (Jared Leto)'s favourite songs.
Kerrang!'s interview is much more serious as it is about a subject close to the artists heart and his feelings. He uses quite formal language with lots of emotive language. The NME interview is quite different. The language is informal and chatty and includes swear words unlike the Kerrang! interview. It is more of a conversation between the two artists with the interviewer cutting in every now and then, setting the scene and explaining what is happening behind the conversation. This interview is more like the interview I am using in my coursework. I wanted an informal look at one of my favourite electro bands. I researched the bands attitude in interviews and tried to incorporate it into my made up interview.
"Murder, blank looks on girls, knives and loads of E." I heard the band say this was their influences on a TV interview so I reworded what they said and used it as a drop quote. I used questions that would have got emotive responses from the artists. I knew that their live gigs were what the band was most known for so I made this the main subject in my interview.
After reading the two similar articles I made changes to the start of my interview, so that the narrator set the scene to the interview more then it had before. I did this because I liked the effect it had in the NME interview.